May 14, 2010

Former Attorney General sues city over Wilmanor Apartments; Lautenschlager representing Spodick in case

Jim Spodick is taking his $650,000 claim against the city to court, and he has a big-name attorney by his side.

Former Attorney General Peg Lautenschlager filed a lawsuit in Racine County Circuit Court Thursday claiming the city reneged on a deal to knock $200,000 off of a mortgage on a low-income apartment building that Spodick had turned around. The complaint alleges Spodick had a deal with former Mayor Gary Becker and City Development Director Brian O'Connell to reduce the mortgage, but the city backed out just before Spodick was to sell the property.

Lautenschlager, who served one term as Attorney General, now works for the Madison-based law firm Bauer & Bach. Daniel Bach, one of the lead partners, is a Racine native.

The suit was delivered to City Hall on Friday and the case has been assigned to Judge Richard Kreul.

Here's the key graph:
That in 2008 and 2009, Jim Spodick had several conversations with city officials regarding the amount  required to pay off the loan. Gary Becker, who serve as mayor of the City of Racine, and Brian O'Connell, who served and serves as Director of City Development, promised Spodick the mortgage payoff amount would be reduced from $675,000 to $475,000 if Spodick could find a buyer for the property.
The city has 20 days to respond to the claim. Kreul will then decide if the case can proceed to trial.

Read our past coverage of the story here.

To recap, the deal surrounds a mortgage Spodick took on in 2006 for the Wilmanor Apartments at 255 N. Memorial Drive. At the time, the low-income apartment building had been through at least three professional management companies, but was deteriorating quickly due to unpaid rent and crime. Becker, knowing Spodick through his work on low-income apartments on West Sixth Street, asked Spodick to takeover the building in hopes of avoiding a default on the mortgage. The default would have been costly for the city because it had received low-income housing tax credits for the property. If the building failed, the city would have had to pay the money back to the federal government.

Spodick and his wife took over management of the building, spent several hundred thousand dollars on renovations, managed the problem tenants and made the apartments profitable. After stabilizing the building, Spodick looked to sell the apartments with the understanding that the city would reduce the mortgage on the property by $200,000 to compensate Spodick for part of the renovations. (Incidentally, it was almost a fluke the city got any money back on the property. Two banks dismissed over $2 million in loans on the property - well more than the apartments were ever worth. The city then fell into first position on the loan, allowing them to collect when Spodick sold the building.

In the lawsuit, Spodick claims he went ahead with a sale assuming the city would reduce the $675,000 mortgage by $200,000. When the city refused the deal, he was on the hook for the money, which cost him an opportunity to buy another building. Spodick is claiming he lost $450,000 because he was unable to complete the purchase.

After the council rejected his request to reduce the mortgage, Spodick filed a claim against the city. The council rejected the claim on Nov. 17, opening the door for Spodick to sue the city.

He'll have a tough case to prove. City Council members argued in November that even if Becker or O'Connell made the deal with Spodick, the council has to give it final approval. But he can also tell a good story about how he helped turn around a problem building and preserved its low-income tax credits, only to lose money in the end.

The wild card may be Becker, who, despite being in prison, could testify in the case. If Kreul allows the case to proceed, Lautenschlager and Spodick may call him to verify their claims of a handshake deal on the property. Then again, it's hard to say how much credibility the former mayor would have under oath.

51 comments:

  1. The wild card is not Becker but the fact that Dickert had the board vote secretly via email and alter the meeting minutes retroactively. If that was not done then Spodick would probably not have a case. This is another case of the cover up causes the damage, not the actual act, and the taxpayers are on the hook.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sounds like the man did what he said he would do. He shouldn't take a beating for it.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Got to love this John Dickert will cost this city quite a bit of money. Hey John take over CAR 25, if you want make it the John is GOD network, it will not keep you out of court nor will it save you from being tossed out of office.
    Hell, this is more fun then watching Gram Norton!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Don't sell this short. Look at all the secret deals that have come out of the woodwork the past few years. They all seem to be found to be true as time passes. All the deals seem to have two names attached. The same two included in this suit. I would think there is a pretty solid case to this law firm to be involved. I wonder how more of these still have to surface.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Get used to it Mayor Dickert. There will be another big litigation coming your way regarding development. For every action there is a reaction.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Dickert = Failure + Corruption

    ReplyDelete
  7. As long as losers like Dickert & Freidel are in charge, this city will never prosper. Arrogant, self rightous, pompous people should not be representing us!

    ReplyDelete
  8. How long do we allow these fools like O'Connell, Dickert and Tom Friedel to run this city into the ground? These idiots have done NOTHING for this city! NOTHING!

    ReplyDelete
  9. You people are ridiculous. He files a frivolous lawsuit and you blame the city.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Anonymous said... SUBJECT CHANGE!

    Interesting how Racine bought up all the land they could to open the view of Lake Michigan and preserved it as public space. Then in last 20 years the mind set has focused on greed and how can we develop it into a place for Rich to have condos.

    I guess Pooh pooh to the average folks! It's the deep pockets that can enjoy the Harbor views.

    I just wonder what kind of taxes they pay on Gas Light Point. I'm sure there was some deal cutting there! I'll bet 10 cents on the dollar compared to regular house taxes.

    The land would have been bought and payed for without tax payers money!

    Samuel C. Johnson gave the Heritage Museum 1.4 million to buy the site. But the Scott Fergus deal and his good old boy crap -- killed it.

    Then you had a moron who said -- Hey! We got a old garbage dump down buy the old Elk's Club. How about that? It's right downtown! Oh boy ----- what a deal.

    That's when Racine kissed a multi-million dollar tourist attraction --- GOODBYE!

    You just have to love the - people running the show here.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I agree. Racine is a cultural waste land. Always has been and always will be a city of small minded people. Conservative money grubbers.

    Look at Kenosha

    Public Museum -- Lake front.

    Civil War Museum -- Lake front.

    Historical Center -- Lake front.

    GO KENOSHA!!

    ReplyDelete
  12. Kenosha has a statue of Columbus welcoming people to it's shore.

    Kenosha is the NEW WORLD.

    Racine is a worn out old world city.

    What happen with the Zahn's Building and our children was so sad.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Anon, 7:02, 7:09,

    It does seem we have been singularly unsuccessful in these areas. We can't even keep a fountain open for children.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Racine is a ghost town because of men like John Dickert and his pals and the looting they have done to our city. Pointe Blue will be the Grande Finale for Dickert. He will not listen to the citizens of Racine and continue on his path of spending. He will empty racine's coffers shortly before leaving politics and live a wealthy life. Pointe Blue is his golden ticket and count on him to redeem it.

    ReplyDelete
  15. It's no one politician. People, generally, just don't follow through on what they say they're going to do.

    ReplyDelete
  16. "What happen with the Zahn's Building and our children was so sad."

    And what two Racine mayors had a hand in that?

    ReplyDelete
  17. Scott Martin5/14/2010 9:57 PM

    Anon: 9:16 Answer: Jim Smith and Gary Becker. This was a deal done by Becker. Where does Dickert get the blame?

    ReplyDelete
  18. I think your forgetting a name,but being a Troll I expect that. Hint Phoenix

    ReplyDelete
  19. Dickert tried to steal the Zahn's building from the little kids that collected pennies for two years in order to build himself a "boutique hotel". Unfortunately, the children didn't collect enough pennies and the Dickerts couldn't build their hotel with the first graders lunch money. To say Dickert had nothing to do with it is a pile of crap.

    ReplyDelete
  20. This is a simple case. A Mayor does not have the authority on his own to make or alter contracts. The Common Council did not approve this "deal", so there was no deal.

    ReplyDelete
  21. This is the 1st time I've posted, but had to. Stop the ridiculous lies. I know for a absolute fact that Dickert never tried to "steal the Zahn's building". He was one of the biggest supporters of the children's museum. He had nothing to do with the deals death. He tried everything to save it. He still would love to have one. There are more lies, but I'll stop at this one.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Kenosha and Racine are both epic fails!

    ReplyDelete
  23. Just tell me what Dickert has accomplished? What is he priding himself on? The guy is a huge failure, as is his counterparts Freidel and O'Connell, LOSERS, and the exact reason why this city is in the state it's in. Ask a Dickert supporter "if there are any" ...what has he accomplished and you'll get the same dumb blank stare.

    ReplyDelete
  24. From an outsider looking in:

    I have to admit, that I had to deal with your Mayor Dickert recently and the only word that comes to mind is he is a "snake". I would not trust him one bit.

    He has personal motives, and they are not in the best interest of your fair city.

    Unfortunately your Mayor Becker was on the right track and had a great vision for Racine's future; but greed and devil got the best of him too.

    It does not help this city that it's school district is corrupt as well. You have so many great assets, but in order for any city to thrive it must have great schools. Your school district administration is more interested in themselves and Sports than Academics. That is very apparent by the way it has spent it's referendum monies and by how they have allowed one of the best schools in the state if not the country to completely decay away. You should all be embarrassed.

    Why would any business want to open shop here?

    The Racine Community needs to take control! Fix your schools, fix your politics and be more business friendly. Open your arms to new business and get your heads out of your A%$. Your community makes it so difficult to expand here that Kenosha and Oak Creek are taking complete advantage of you.

    WAKE UP RACINE!

    ReplyDelete
  25. It never ends, does it?

    Pigs rooting in the mud.

    ReplyDelete
  26. More like,

    Dickert=Dumb=Loser

    ReplyDelete
  27. It is to bad Spodick is not a friend of Dickert, otherwise Dickert would just "settle" his case and write him a taxpayer check like he did with his "friend" Sandy Tingle.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Reminder:

    One should always consider the source of a "comment" when reading Racine Post. Even more so when the source of the content is from someone Anonymous. Even this comment if you so choose.

    This comment is still valid, however, as it refers to no subject other than this reminder.

    ReplyDelete
  29. 8:08 = PIO your tax money at work

    ReplyDelete
  30. Thank God we have leaders like Mayor Dickert in this city! Where else could lawyers find so much work?

    BTW Mayor have you made that phone call to Obama yet? Not the one getting help for Racine, the one looking for a new job.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Let us not forget that this guy is also a friend of Dickerts and therefore will probably get what he wants.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Screwing is what the Dickerts do well. Ask him how many families that his "Uncle Jim" took down the tubes when he bankrupted at Jamestown. "Team Dickert" remember that? Birds of a feather flock together.

    ReplyDelete
  33. I am taking this oppotunity to ask Mayor Dickert, Tom Freidel, and Brian O'Connell to resign. Gentlemen this is not a threat but a promise if you do not do so your lives as you know them will be HELL!

    ReplyDelete
  34. It sucks to be so harsh on these guys, but they really do deserve to be ousted. I mean would YOU do business with Dickert or Freidel? I don't think so. People are sick and tired of being lied to and sick and tired of the sheer arrogance of both of these guys. It's a severe loss to this city to have these people in charge and I do agree, if they cared about the city and it's people they would just resign. They have done nothing but be unethical and unprofessional for the past year.

    ReplyDelete
  35. Lets just skip the middle man and "hang em all"!!!

    ReplyDelete
  36. "Johnnie Boy" has uncle Jimmy found the 10k that he screwed me out of 19 years ago or is he still looking for it? Seems that one anonymous poster knows about this group and how they use people up, drag them out and then eventually just "F" them over. The Dickert name is not one of high moral or ethical standards, trust me I know first handed.

    ReplyDelete
  37. Have Dickert, Friedel, or O'Connell ever run a business? By the way they are costing Racine money I would guess no.

    ReplyDelete
  38. I have to say that I hope John is of better moral fiber and brains than his Uncle Jim, who thinks nothing of screwing over anyone he can for a buck, apparently, time and time again.

    ReplyDelete
  39. Now I understand what is happening here. Someone feels screwed the John's uncle and is making multiple postings hoping to get revenge. He tells it was 19 yrs ago.

    Sound advice: Get over it.

    ReplyDelete
  40. Back to this lawsuit - It was the meeting in secret by the loan board and the cover-up by changing the minutes of the meeting that will cause the City to lose this lawsuit. About time they learn a lesson...

    ReplyDelete
  41. Doesn't this guy know about getting these transactions on Paper?

    ReplyDelete
  42. Dickert thinks that everyone buys into his BS. He thinks that people believe his words and never pay attention to his actions. Dickert is a scumbag and double-talker. He is a liar and a cheater and always has been. He will scam this city down to its knickers. He had everything to do with the Spodick case and you will see that he has had everything to do with many other fiascos.

    ReplyDelete
  43. 4:56, I think he has them on a audio recording device isn't that as good as paper?

    ReplyDelete
  44. For those who have trouble with literacy, Becker made the deal not Dickert.

    ReplyDelete
  45. And Dickert is the one who reneged on the deal, altered minutes, had the committee vote secretly via email.

    ReplyDelete
  46. What else might this court case uncover? Not what Dickert wants going into a campaign.

    ReplyDelete
  47. There is no way Dickert wants to be put under oath in a deposition. I bet this gets settled quickly.

    ReplyDelete
  48. This is what RCEDC calls economic development.

    ReplyDelete
  49. It will certainly employ lawyers, just not Racine ones.

    ReplyDelete
  50. If, in fact, there is anything on tape with city officials agreeing to the $200K discount, it will be interesting to see if the court recognizes that as a verbal agreement in lieu of a signed contract. I would certainly hope not, in view of the fact that it is something the city council should have ratified. Otherwise it could set a precedent for the mayor to make legally binding deals without the consent of the city council.

    ReplyDelete
  51. kate remington5/24/2010 7:34 PM

    I wish you success in this suit, Jim. You have been savaged over the years in so many ways. I know how you and Lisa et al. made Wilmanor once again a good place to live at a reasonable rent.

    ReplyDelete